Airport Stormwater Treatment Using CPI Oil Separators
Airport Stormwater Treatment Areas Using CPI Oil Separators
Many airports experience contaminated stormwater runoff as a result of jet fuel, gasoline and oil spills and leaks.
1. The Design Basis of the Stormwater Treatment Area
The MAHB design criteria was to capture and treat stormflows from storms with a 1-in-5-year probability of occurrence, as well as to achieve a treated stormwater oil content that complied with Malaysia Standard B Discharge Standard.
MAHB specified ten (10) stormwater drainage catchment systems within Terminal T2, with a total design flow rate of 61,000 m3/h. The feed oil concentration in the design was 4,250 mg/l. The discharge standard required a treated stormwater oil content of 5 mg/l, representing a 99.9% capture rate.
MAHB further required that the oil separators had to be below ground and covered.
2. The Oil Separators Design
The oil separators were designed in accordance with British Standard BS EN858-1&2 and American Petroleum Institute API-421 principles.
SWA detailed design determined that the optimum design required eighteen (18) oil separators to be installed in ten (10) drainage locations, with some separators installed in pairs and others in singles, with each oil separator having a design flowrate ranging from 1,368 m3/h to 9,900 m3/h. To satisfy the MAHB requirement of the oil separators being buried below ground, the style of oil separator chosen was for cylindrical horizontal steel tanks, up to 3.5m in diameter and up to 14m long.
Impact of Varying Temperatures and Oil Specific Gravity
The impact of varying operating temperatures and various oil specific gravity were taken into consideration, as summarized in the following tables:
Temperature | SG (Oil) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.7 | 0.75 | 0.8 | 0.85 | 0.9 | |
Oil droplet size separated (micron) (100%) | |||||
20 | 80 | 100 | 120 | 135 | 150 |
30 | 72 | 90 | 110 | 125 | 140 |
40 | 65 | 80 | 95 | 112 | 130 |
3. The Stormwater System Installation Process
Eighteen oil separators were installed in ten locations, treating a combined design storm flowrate of 61,000 m3/h.
Test & Commission
Since the oil separators’ design flowrate was so large, MAHB determined that testing two of the ten Oil Separator sites would be sufficient to demonstrate the oil separators’ performance for Acceptance Testing purposes. Diesel was chosen for the tests because of its low specific gravity and lack of explosive properties.
The fire water service flowrate was also too low in comparison to the design flowrate of the oil separators, so on test day, a large number of flexible water “bladders” and one tanker of diesel were lined up on the aircraft taxiway. The fire main valves were fully opened before the water tankers released their loads in order to achieve the required design flowrate and the diesel was discharged from the tanker at a known and controlled flowrate.
During the test, samples of treated water were collected every minute and sent to a registered laboratory for analysis. All tests resulted in an oil concentration of less than 5 mg/l, meeting the design requirements and passing the Performance Tests with flying colours.
4. Summary
The project was successfully implemented through all aspects of the project – design, manufacture, construction, testing and commissioning. Nearly ten years on, MAHB still has a world-class Stormwater treatment system at the KLIA Terminal T2 Airport. For more detailed information on our stormwater engineering and water treatment services, including these oil separators or for the treatment of large oil-contaminated storm flows, contact SWA Water at info@swawater.com.au or visit our website at www.swawater.com.au.